Defence Technology Series: 1. What Is Defence Technology → 2. Sensors & Radar → 3. Radar Range Equation → 4. Phased Array & AESA Radars → 5. Stealth vs Radar
Stealth vs Radar: The Physics Arms Race
Scattering, absorption, and why invisibility is a myth
The myth of invisibility
Stealth aircraft are often described as “invisible to radar.” This is technically false. Radar invisibility does not exist. What does exist is radar detectability management.
Stealth is not about eliminating reflections, but about ensuring that the reflected signal never rises above the radar’s detection threshold.
Radar detection is a signal problem
From the radar’s perspective, detection is a competition between signal and noise.
Detection ⇔ Signal-to-Noise Ratio ≥ Threshold
Stealth technologies aim to reduce the signal term in the radar range equation, especially the radar cross section σ.
Electromagnetic scattering
When radar waves strike an object, three things happen simultaneously:
- Some energy is reflected
- Some energy is absorbed
- Some energy is scattered in other directions
Conventional aircraft shapes scatter energy back toward the radar. Stealth shapes deliberately redirect scattering away from the source.
Shaping: geometry as physics
Stealth shaping relies on controlling surface angles so that specular reflections never return to the emitting radar.
Flat facets and continuous edge alignment are not aesthetic choices. They are solutions to Maxwell’s equations applied at large scale.
A curved surface can behave like a mirror. A carefully angled surface behaves like a signal deflector.
Radar-absorbing materials (RAM)
Beyond geometry, stealth uses materials that convert electromagnetic energy into heat.
These materials are engineered so that their impedance closely matches free space, minimizing reflections at the surface.
Reflection ↓ when impedance mismatch ↓
RAM is most effective over limited frequency bands, which immediately reveals a vulnerability: stealth is frequency-dependent.
Wavelength matters
Stealth shaping is optimized for wavelengths comparable to aircraft dimensions (typically centimetric radar bands).
Long-wavelength radars (VHF/UHF) interact differently, often reducing the effectiveness of shaping techniques.
This is why modern air defence relies on multi-band radar networks rather than a single sensor.
Stealth increases uncertainty, not immunity
Stealth does not prevent detection; it delays it, degrades accuracy, and increases uncertainty in tracking.
A stealth aircraft may be detected intermittently, at shorter ranges, or with poor angular resolution — but not perfectly tracked.
The counter-response: sensor fusion
Modern defence systems combine radar, infrared search-and-track (IRST), passive sensors, and data links.
The weakness of one sensor becomes acceptable when compensated by others. This is not sensor supremacy — it is sensor cooperation.
Strategic reality
The stealth vs radar contest has no final winner. Each advance reshapes the balance temporarily.
In this arms race, the true advantage lies not in invisibility, but in information asymmetry.
Comments
Post a Comment